原帖由 游而生侠 于 2010-8-26 11:25 发表
这个机器,好像叫入门级的“旗舰”吧。
再说说老生常谈的话题。
关于器材。
分2个层面来谈,一是私费。购买力强的,啥都别说了,想买啥买啥,能用上用上,不能用,自己欣赏。“我有”。有个文章,说美国人哪怕工间 ...
原帖由 钟乳石 于 2010-8-26 11:44 发表
数码机发展到现在,大家都掌握了成熟的技术,相互间的差距已经很小了,如今的数码机的原理不作根本改变,是不会有上一台阶跨跃的,不要特别迷恋评测,评测只是个传说,自己拍的随手,拍出作品才是真的,老一点相机, ...
原帖由 zhouw100 于 2010-8-26 12:02 发表
分析得透彻!
偶有一去年进藏的朋友,人民日报社的,机身3个,镜头若干,大炮600,摄影器材带了半车,一路狂拍。
另一哥们有钱,LC200、BMW740各一辆,NIKON D3X小钢炮也一路猛拍。
玩摄影器材确实很重要 ...
原帖由 游而生侠 于 2010-8-26 12:20 发表
我们在实践中可以得出经验,与其说机身重要,要不如说镜头最重要,我们可以得出这样一个结论:镜头的变化(比如镜片的材料)比机身慢,甚至没变化,因此,我们是不是树立这样一个观念:在有限的预算内,优先保证 ...
原帖由 钟乳石 于 2010-8-26 15:25 发表
说一个亲身经历的故事
07年北京有个摄影器材展,当时我正好在北京,就去看展览了,为方便只带了一个400D装一个35mm小定焦头,拍一点资料回来。展会上腾龙展位有拍模特的比赛,我整一天也没地方去,就想挤进去拍几 ...
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-26 14:47 发表
其实。。。无知者无畏挺好。。。。
看完这篇,我就上550D。。。。上三个镜头------有上述区间的变焦头:16—35、24-70、70-200,俗称3剑客,以此类推。
虽然。。我还没有弄明白,什么叫景深,什么叫光圈。。。。
...
原帖由 游而生侠 于 2010-8-26 15:37 发表
这个选择不错。
可以肯定地告诉你,你扛个550D,再弄3个2.8的头,没人敢斜视你。
你要扛个1DSMK3,弄一个28--200的5.6,大家都斜视你。
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-26 16:13 发表
我是来学摄影的。。。不是来搞拉风的。。你对后辈。。不能这么带着往虚荣方向跑。。。。。。
唉。。还是学习去。。。你说这几个数据。。我一个没看懂。。。
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-26 16:13 发表
我是来学摄影的。。。不是来搞拉风的。。你对后辈。。不能这么带着往虚荣方向跑。。。。。。
唉。。还是学习去。。。你说这几个数据。。我一个没看懂。。。
原帖由 细细里 于 2010-8-26 10:05 发表 Conclusion - ProsConclusion - Cons
- Excellent detail and resolution (especially in raw mode)
- Lovely new LCD screen - the 3:2 format really makes a difference.
- Capable, flexible AF system in both phase-detection and live view modes
- High-spec video mode, including external microphone jack
- Highly intuitive operation, refined ergonomics
- Fast and responsive operation (although shooting in raw mode slows things down)
- Very reliable metering and white balance in most shooting situations
- Decent build quality for the price - no creaks
- Highlight Tone Priority works well, in both raw and JPEG mode.
- Excellent battery life for its class
- Acceptable - although not outstanding - image quality at highest ISO settings.
- Excellent supplied software suite - DPP is one of the best bundled raw converters around
Overall conclusion As I mentioned in the introduction to this review, Canon has pulled out all the stops with the EOS 550D, and has delivered the most highly specified Rebel-series DSLR we've ever seen. In practice, the camera does not disappoint, and in all respects it gives excellent performance, at least matching but in most cases bettering the best of the competition. Given that the competition includes cameras like the excellent Pentax K-x, and Nikon D5000 - both of which also feature video capture - this is high praise indeed.
- Auto Lighting Optimizer's effect is subtle to the point of being unnoticeable
- No rear control dial (as found on higher-end Canon bodies)
- Entry-level ergonomics won't suit everyone (the EOS 50D and 7D just feel nicer)
- No in-camera raw conversion option
- Slightly soft JPEG output at default settings (but this is far from unusual)
- Chroma noise takes a fairly big chunk out of resolution at ISO 12800 (but better than the 500D)
- AF assist strobe can be annoying
After extended use of the EOS 550D, one of the most impressive things about the camera is its consistency. The 550D can be relied upon in almost any environment to deliver pleasant, well-exposed images, and although it obviously can't match the likes of the EOS 1D Mark IV or the Nikon D3S at its highest ISO setting of 12800, it is measurably better than its predecessor the EOS 500D, despite a hike in resolution. This is impressive in itself, but the fact that the 550D also brings an improved video mode (equal in the essential points to the current best video-enabled DSLRs on the market) will come as music to the ears of Canon users looking either to upgrade from a 1000D or 450D, or to 7D users looking for a (relatively) inexpensive backup camera.
It is these photographers, who already own a higher-end DSLR, that I think will really appreciate the 550D. Despite the entry-level ergonomics, and the inclusion of beginner-friendly features like Creative Auto mode, the 550D is actually closer to the EOS 7D in terms of specification. Crucially, it delivers this specification at a fraction of the size and weight, not to mention a lower price.
Image Quality
As you can see from the shooting that we've done for this test, the EOS 550D sets new standards for resolution in its class. In favorable conditions, in raw mode, it is clear that the 550D can unequivocally resolve more detail than an equivalent camera with 12 or 14 million pixels. Resolution in JPEG mode is lower than RAW, as we would expect, but at a pixel level, the difference should not concern most users. Unfortunately, however, the high pixel count of the 550D's CMOS sensor is something of a double-edged sword. Whilst it means that in optimal conditions, with a high quality lens attached, detail resolution is superb, it can also mean that when viewed at 100% on screen, images taken with cheaper, lower quality optics (including the bundled 'kit' option 18-55mm) look distinctly sub-par. It's an obvious point - higher resolution sensors make higher demands on lenses - but it is one which is easily overlooked in the race to put higher and higher pixel counts into low-end and enthusiast DSLRs.
The unavoidable fact is that to get the most out of the 550D's sensor you really need to pair it with Canon's better lenses, which is a considerable investment. Arguably, this is academic for most enthusiast photographers, since most of the time digital images are either admired onscreen or in small (sub-A4) prints. Of course if this is how you primarily view your images (and if we're honest, for most of us it is), it could be argued that packing 18 million pixels is somewhat unnecessary in the first place.
That said, the bottom line here is that the EOS 550D offers excellent image quality in a range of different conditions, including exceptionally low light, thanks to its usable ISO 12800 setting. Image quality is equal or better than its predecessor the EOS 500D, and not noticeably inferior to the considerably more expensive EOS 7D. The 550D's video capability is excellent too.
Handling The EOS 550D is the latest product in a long line of Rebel-series DSLRs which all share basically the same design intent - to make the camera's various advanced features as easy to use, and as easy to understand as possible. As such, it represents not a revolutionary ergonomic advance, but rather a slight refinement of a proven basic design. The handling differences between the 550D and 500D are very minor, and are a consequence mostly of the new, larger LCD screen, but the handling experience of both cameras is to all intents and purposes identical.
The 550D doesn't provide a flawless handling experience though, and we do have some criticisms. The buttons on the rear are rather flat and close together, which makes it easy to mash them by accident, and very hard to press them accurately if your hands are cold/gloved/large. The general feel of the camera is plastic, and although far from flimsy, it doesn't have the reassuring heft of the EOS 50D or 7D. We wouldn't necessarily expect it to, but it is a shame that a camera with so much more to offer than the EOS 1000D (and at a considerably higher price) should have such similar build quality.
It is also a shame that the 550D doesn't share the EOS 7D's stills/video shooting switch. This switch goes a long way to solving the problem of integrating video into a stills camera without the function feeling 'bolted on' and the fact that the EOS 550D - which is aimed at a less sophisticated audience - doesn't have it is frankly a little bizarre. After all, in theory, it is lower end users who will be most used to shooting video on cameraphones and compact cameras, so why not make this feature as easy to use as possible?
The final word Despite our (very minor) complaints, the EOS 550D is a very satisfying camera, and certainly offers the most compelling feature set of any nominally 'entry level' DSLR that we've used. It isn't just about spec though - the 550D's refined handling and excellent supplied software suite should not be overlooked. Although it doesn't represent a huge improvement over the 500D, the changes that have been made are worthwhile, and well-implemented. An external mic socket, manual control and wide choice of resolutions and frame rates means that the 550D is worthy of consideration for serious video use, and when paired with a high quality lens, image quality is superb.
With all this taken into account, it is hard not to recommend the EOS 550D. Quite simply, taken as a whole, it is the best camera of its class that we've ever seen, and one of those rare cameras that won't look out of date in a couple of years' time.
原帖由 alexmei 于 2010-8-26 19:33 发表
来翻译的, 哈哈------
结论 - 优点
*优异的清晰度和分辨率(特别是在原始模式)
*可爱的新液晶屏幕 - 3:2格式确实有差别。
*有能力,灵活的自动对焦两个阶段的检测和现场查看系统模式 ...
原帖由 alexmei 于 2010-8-26 19:33 发表
来翻译的, 哈哈------
结论 - 优点
*优异的清晰度和分辨率(特别是在原始模式)
*可爱的新液晶屏幕 - 3:2格式确实有差别。
*有能力,灵活的自动对焦两个阶段的检测和现场查看系统模式 ...
原帖由 钟乳石 于 2010-8-26 18:19 发表
不懂不可怕,就怕不想弄懂,都是从不懂走过来的,没有什么可怕的。
我帮你解释一下:
550D是小感光体(感光体尺寸为22.2×14.8mm也称为APS),是普及型单反,而所谓3只2.8的头,一般是指这三个镜头,16- ...
原帖由 钟乳石 于 2010-8-26 18:19 发表
不懂不可怕,就怕不想弄懂,都是从不懂走过来的,没有什么可怕的。
我帮你解释一下:
550D是小感光体(感光体尺寸为22.2×14.8mm也称为APS),是普及型单反,而所谓3只2.8的头,一般是指这三个镜头,16- ...
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-27 10:02 发表
再次感谢,既然话说到这了,想问问如果三选一的话,最先买哪个?
新人入门,我觉得,慢慢学习,慢慢琢磨,慢慢提高,设备也是慢慢增加,如果一步到位买三个,无法正确使用和发挥,也是一种浪费,也有卖弄之嫌疑。 ...
原帖由 细细里 于 2010-8-27 10:11 发表
如果先买一个,如果是我,就在这三个里面选,我选24-70/2.8 这是最常用的焦段,当然这只头也不负佳能锦皇的美誉
当然,这是我的习惯,我对超广和长焦用得都不多
原帖由 老贼 于 2010-8-29 13:44 发表
没看完所有贴子。。
碰巧我也有一部,呵呵。
今年初一上市就买了,只为了它的高感及高清摄像。还有一点,就是我怎也看不上无敌兔。
呵呵。。。看完新推出的60D,还琢磨着是否卖了1DS再进部550D来呢,多轻便 ...
原帖由 大炮手 于 2010-8-30 17:05 发表
到现在我的那个350D还没下岗,配死马的俩镜头50-1.4跟小黑,感觉在自己目前的手艺下,完全没有必要升级换代,350对焦系统不大好,无非就是多拍几张。看了细细里给新手配的配置我感到有点不好意思了
原帖由 游而生侠 于 2010-8-26 11:25 发表
这个机器,好像叫入门级的“旗舰”吧。
再说说老生常谈的话题。
关于器材。
分2个层面来谈,一是私费。购买力强的,啥都别说了,想买啥买啥,能用上用上,不能用,自己欣赏。“我有”。有个文章,说美国人哪怕工间 ...
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-26 14:47 发表
其实。。。无知者无畏挺好。。。。
看完这篇,我就上550D。。。。上三个镜头------有上述区间的变焦头:16—35、24-70、70-200,俗称3剑客,以此类推。
虽然。。我还没有弄明白,什么叫景深,什么叫光圈。。。。
...
原帖由 野酒窝 于 2010-8-27 10:02 发表
再次感谢,既然话说到这了,想问问如果三选一的话,最先买哪个?
新人入门,我觉得,慢慢学习,慢慢琢磨,慢慢提高,设备也是慢慢增加,如果一步到位买三个,无法正确使用和发挥,也是一种浪费,也有卖弄之嫌疑。 ...
欢迎光临 越野e族论坛 (http://bbs-data.fblife.com/) | X3.2 |